<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OFF: Should Kim Clijsters Have Skipped the Farewell Tour?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onthebaseline.com/2007/05/04/off-should-kim-clijsters-have-skipped-the-farewell-tour/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2007/05/04/off-should-kim-clijsters-have-skipped-the-farewell-tour/</link>
	<description>Women&#039;s Professional Tennis News, Results, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:50:16 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nexty</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2007/05/04/off-should-kim-clijsters-have-skipped-the-farewell-tour/comment-page-1/#comment-15424</link>
		<dc:creator>Nexty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 02:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/2007/05/04/off-should-kim-clijsters-have-skipped-the-farewell-tour/#comment-15424</guid>
		<description>Thaks Aaresse for answeing..I have nothing to add, things  are clear enough!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thaks Aaresse for answeing..I have nothing to add, things  are clear enough!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyandream</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2007/05/04/off-should-kim-clijsters-have-skipped-the-farewell-tour/comment-page-1/#comment-15411</link>
		<dc:creator>cyandream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 18:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/2007/05/04/off-should-kim-clijsters-have-skipped-the-farewell-tour/#comment-15411</guid>
		<description>As long as Kim is up front about her plans which IMO she has been, I have no problem with her picking and choosing her tournaments.  She has given the TD&#039;s plenty of warning.

As far as her loss in Warsaw, I think way too much has been made of it.  So she lowt to a qualifer who was playing her 4th match at the tourney and was acclimated to the clay.  I can&#039;t imagine Kim spent a lot of time practicing on the dirt for one tournament.  She only lost by a break of serve, and from the stats simply looks like she couldn&#039;t get a groove on her serve.  I&#039;m not all that surprised she lost to Julia.   I don&#039;t think it&#039;s an indication she should have skipped this tournament, any more than Nadia losing to Mara means Nadia should have quit tennis earler.

As far as Wimbledon, there reallly aren&#039;t a lot of warm up tournaments or preparations for it anyway.  It&#039;s not a surface you necessarily practice to.  I see no reason why depending on her draw, she can&#039;t get to at least the SF&#039;s again.  As far as skipping clay to concentrate on grass, well she&#039;s in fine company there because numerous players including Lendl, Navratilova, etc have done so.

As far as skipping the USO, sure I&#039;m disappointed. OTOH, she&#039;s not Justine, I don&#039;t think she would spend most of her honeymoon practicing, so the odds of her &quot;defending&quot; her 2005 cup are low.  I can see why she would want her last memories of Flushing Meadows to be her championship.  And I can&#039;t imagine she feels the  need to show to the USO to make her good-byes that she feels for the smaller, friendlier and cozier tournaments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as Kim is up front about her plans which IMO she has been, I have no problem with her picking and choosing her tournaments.  She has given the TD&#8217;s plenty of warning.</p>
<p>As far as her loss in Warsaw, I think way too much has been made of it.  So she lowt to a qualifer who was playing her 4th match at the tourney and was acclimated to the clay.  I can&#8217;t imagine Kim spent a lot of time practicing on the dirt for one tournament.  She only lost by a break of serve, and from the stats simply looks like she couldn&#8217;t get a groove on her serve.  I&#8217;m not all that surprised she lost to Julia.   I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s an indication she should have skipped this tournament, any more than Nadia losing to Mara means Nadia should have quit tennis earler.</p>
<p>As far as Wimbledon, there reallly aren&#8217;t a lot of warm up tournaments or preparations for it anyway.  It&#8217;s not a surface you necessarily practice to.  I see no reason why depending on her draw, she can&#8217;t get to at least the SF&#8217;s again.  As far as skipping clay to concentrate on grass, well she&#8217;s in fine company there because numerous players including Lendl, Navratilova, etc have done so.</p>
<p>As far as skipping the USO, sure I&#8217;m disappointed. OTOH, she&#8217;s not Justine, I don&#8217;t think she would spend most of her honeymoon practicing, so the odds of her &#8220;defending&#8221; her 2005 cup are low.  I can see why she would want her last memories of Flushing Meadows to be her championship.  And I can&#8217;t imagine she feels the  need to show to the USO to make her good-byes that she feels for the smaller, friendlier and cozier tournaments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2007/05/04/off-should-kim-clijsters-have-skipped-the-farewell-tour/comment-page-1/#comment-15408</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 17:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/2007/05/04/off-should-kim-clijsters-have-skipped-the-farewell-tour/#comment-15408</guid>
		<description>If she wasn&#039;t planning on really PLAYING this year, she might as well have told us last year would be her &quot;farewell journey&quot;.  As to Wimbledon--it&#039;s Kim&#039;s poorest surface and she&#039;ll be going in with very little match play.  I don&#039;t expect her to survive the 4th round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If she wasn&#8217;t planning on really PLAYING this year, she might as well have told us last year would be her &#8220;farewell journey&#8221;.  As to Wimbledon&#8211;it&#8217;s Kim&#8217;s poorest surface and she&#8217;ll be going in with very little match play.  I don&#8217;t expect her to survive the 4th round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2007/05/04/off-should-kim-clijsters-have-skipped-the-farewell-tour/comment-page-1/#comment-15394</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 02:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/2007/05/04/off-should-kim-clijsters-have-skipped-the-farewell-tour/#comment-15394</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll KISS: she can play the tournaments she wants to, but I still think she&#039;s a moron for skipping the home of her only Slam.

I think she would have retired if she had won the Antwerp final. No more Slams, no nothing. Alas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll KISS: she can play the tournaments she wants to, but I still think she&#8217;s a moron for skipping the home of her only Slam.</p>
<p>I think she would have retired if she had won the Antwerp final. No more Slams, no nothing. Alas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
