<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can the Sony Ericsson WTA Tour Improve Tennis&#8217; Popularity?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/02/13/can-the-sony-ericsson-wta-tour-improve-tennis-popularity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/02/13/can-the-sony-ericsson-wta-tour-improve-tennis-popularity/</link>
	<description>Women&#039;s Professional Tennis News, Results, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:59:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Operation Doubles Tennis</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/02/13/can-the-sony-ericsson-wta-tour-improve-tennis-popularity/comment-page-1/#comment-22485</link>
		<dc:creator>Operation Doubles Tennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/02/13/can-the-sony-ericsson-wta-tour-improve-tennis-popularity/#comment-22485</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Making Women&#039;s Tennis More Popular...&lt;/strong&gt;

In case you missed it, here is an article at On the Baseline about what the WTA Tour can do to to improve the popularity of tennis (as a spectator sport). For the most part, I agree, especially with the suggestion to make sure the top players compete i...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Making Women&#8217;s Tennis More Popular&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In case you missed it, here is an article at On the Baseline about what the WTA Tour can do to to improve the popularity of tennis (as a spectator sport). For the most part, I agree, especially with the suggestion to make sure the top players compete i&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pov</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/02/13/can-the-sony-ericsson-wta-tour-improve-tennis-popularity/comment-page-1/#comment-22458</link>
		<dc:creator>pov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/02/13/can-the-sony-ericsson-wta-tour-improve-tennis-popularity/#comment-22458</guid>
		<description>I respectfully disagree with your assessment on why tennis isn&#039;t more popular. At least with the part on scoring. 15 - 30 - 40 - match is not even remotely confusing and simply not hard for anyone. People may say they &quot;don&#039;t get it&quot; but what they mean is that they think it&#039;s a silly format, not so much that they don&#039;t grasp it. 

-----
That said onto  what can be done.

The &quot;sex&quot; thing.
I&#039;ll say physical attraction. I think the thing is to combine a focus on both skills and  appeal. I think it fair to say that many woman NFL fans have fav players that they find sexy. Actually traditionally in many quarters athletic women are often considered anti-sexy. The trad sexist view  is that it&#039;s  men who are supposed to have buff, in-shape bodies and be hardcore athletes. Think about it  - a muscular woman who is 6&#039;2&quot;, plays to ******* and grunts more than any man is considered sexy? I think that&#039;s great. What I don&#039;t think helps is the focus on it outside of an athletic context. E.g. The evening gown/pumps stuff.

Beyond that I think what would make a difference is camera use. The way matches are televised doesn&#039;t use angles and perspectives that maximize the action. And as much as people complain about the aforementioned grunting, it adds sound effects that heighten the sense of action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I respectfully disagree with your assessment on why tennis isn&#8217;t more popular. At least with the part on scoring. 15 &#8211; 30 &#8211; 40 &#8211; match is not even remotely confusing and simply not hard for anyone. People may say they &#8220;don&#8217;t get it&#8221; but what they mean is that they think it&#8217;s a silly format, not so much that they don&#8217;t grasp it. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;<br />
That said onto  what can be done.</p>
<p>The &#8220;sex&#8221; thing.<br />
I&#8217;ll say physical attraction. I think the thing is to combine a focus on both skills and  appeal. I think it fair to say that many woman NFL fans have fav players that they find sexy. Actually traditionally in many quarters athletic women are often considered anti-sexy. The trad sexist view  is that it&#8217;s  men who are supposed to have buff, in-shape bodies and be hardcore athletes. Think about it  &#8211; a muscular woman who is 6&#8217;2&#8243;, plays to ******* and grunts more than any man is considered sexy? I think that&#8217;s great. What I don&#8217;t think helps is the focus on it outside of an athletic context. E.g. The evening gown/pumps stuff.</p>
<p>Beyond that I think what would make a difference is camera use. The way matches are televised doesn&#8217;t use angles and perspectives that maximize the action. And as much as people complain about the aforementioned grunting, it adds sound effects that heighten the sense of action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

