<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OFF: Maria Sharapova Speaks Out Against WTA Tour</title>
	<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/</link>
	<description>Women's Professional Tennis News, Results, and Commentary</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2008 Tennis Season in Review: May - On the Baseline Tennis News</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-33602</link>
		<dc:creator>2008 Tennis Season in Review: May - On the Baseline Tennis News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-33602</guid>
		<description>[...] Maria Sharapova sparked controversy by her decision to speak out against the WTA Tour&#8217;s promotional requirements and fines.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Maria Sharapova sparked controversy by her decision to speak out against the WTA Tour&#8217;s promotional requirements and fines.  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Sharapova, WTA Tour Reach Tennis Photo Shoot Compromise - On the Baseline Tennis News</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-24020</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Sharapova, WTA Tour Reach Tennis Photo Shoot Compromise - On the Baseline Tennis News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-24020</guid>
		<description>[...] reading threats of an organized boycott or legal action, the WTA Tour decided that although Sharapova would still be required to participate in a marketing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] reading threats of an organized boycott or legal action, the WTA Tour decided that although Sharapova would still be required to participate in a marketing [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mashapower</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-24012</link>
		<dc:creator>Mashapower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 04:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-24012</guid>
		<description>Give Masha a breack Wta ***** if she says that she doesn't have the ability to photoshoot just before a tournament this means she can't... According to what she says, she setted up rules saying that she doesn't photoshoot before an event well why is this happening ! This just a freacking plot to absolutely prevent Maria from winning her first tier I event on clay...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give Masha a breack Wta ***** if she says that she doesn&#8217;t have the ability to photoshoot just before a tournament this means she can&#8217;t&#8230; According to what she says, she setted up rules saying that she doesn&#8217;t photoshoot before an event well why is this happening ! This just a freacking plot to absolutely prevent Maria from winning her first tier I event on clay&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-23956</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-23956</guid>
		<description>thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaress @ On the Baseline</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-23940</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaress @ On the Baseline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-23940</guid>
		<description>Alice, no problem. I have removed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alice, no problem. I have removed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-23939</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-23939</guid>
		<description>Aaress, would it possible for you to remove my last comment?

On reflection It's probably not helpful of me to make certain comments, without providing clarification.

Thanks

Alice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaress, would it possible for you to remove my last comment?</p>
<p>On reflection It&#8217;s probably not helpful of me to make certain comments, without providing clarification.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Alice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Sharapova Fires Third Shot Across WTA Tour Bow - On the Baseline Tennis News</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-23924</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Sharapova Fires Third Shot Across WTA Tour Bow - On the Baseline Tennis News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-23924</guid>
		<description>[...] first two blog entries landed her at the top of the headlines and although this has turned into a fiasco, it has certainly brought her a boatload of attention. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] first two blog entries landed her at the top of the headlines and although this has turned into a fiasco, it has certainly brought her a boatload of attention. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaress @ On the Baseline</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-23922</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaress @ On the Baseline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-23922</guid>
		<description>Well Pov, obviously I'm not a lawyer, but I don't think Sharapova would have any problem finding a lawyer who would contend that it is fairly ambiguous. 

Though, I sincerely hope this does not head in the direction of the courts, cause that is the last thing the Tour needs right now. This is something that should be settled between Sharapova, IMG, and the WTA Tour.

Between Richard Williams threatening to sue the Tour over Indian Wells next season and Sharapova going public with this issue, it could lead to several rough months for Larry Scott. 

Although, at least no one is calling for a job review like what the top ATP players are doing for Etienne de Villiers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Pov, obviously I&#8217;m not a lawyer, but I don&#8217;t think Sharapova would have any problem finding a lawyer who would contend that it is fairly ambiguous. </p>
<p>Though, I sincerely hope this does not head in the direction of the courts, cause that is the last thing the Tour needs right now. This is something that should be settled between Sharapova, IMG, and the WTA Tour.</p>
<p>Between Richard Williams threatening to sue the Tour over Indian Wells next season and Sharapova going public with this issue, it could lead to several rough months for Larry Scott. </p>
<p>Although, at least no one is calling for a job review like what the top ATP players are doing for Etienne de Villiers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pov</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-23920</link>
		<dc:creator>pov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 21:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-23920</guid>
		<description>Aaress,
  Thanks. I think you have it.  What I posted about is on page 99 - vi. Photo Opportunities. However, what you posted from page 107 does seem to be what this is all about. 

The $400,000 extra seems to be based on an accrual of patch violations (pg.111) Not sure what the initial $300,000 is based on.

But yeah, thanks again. So the WTA does have such a rule - although their scheduling seems really ridiculous. On the other hand this rule  states "or at such other mutually-agreeable date and location" Does that make it ambiguous?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaress,<br />
  Thanks. I think you have it.  What I posted about is on page 99 - vi. Photo Opportunities. However, what you posted from page 107 does seem to be what this is all about. </p>
<p>The $400,000 extra seems to be based on an accrual of patch violations (pg.111) Not sure what the initial $300,000 is based on.</p>
<p>But yeah, thanks again. So the WTA does have such a rule - although their scheduling seems really ridiculous. On the other hand this rule  states &#8220;or at such other mutually-agreeable date and location&#8221; Does that make it ambiguous?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaress @ On the Baseline</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-23918</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaress @ On the Baseline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 20:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2008/05/02/off-maria-sharapova-speaks-out-against-wta-tour/#comment-23918</guid>
		<description>Pov, 

I'm not sure if I'll be able to shine much light on the rules situation, but I'll give it my best shot. 

The Sharapova situation is tricky as it involves several rule contingencies. For all her off-court activities, Sharapova is not known as one of the Tour's most giving when it comes to her time during tournaments. 

The most recent ACES standings that I can find were from April 21, which show Sharapova down at No. 10.

Another reason why Sharapova could incur an additional fine is because she does not wear a Tour patch. Players can support the Tour (and avoid fines) in a lot of ways including participating in tournament off-court events, doing photo shoots, or wearing the Tour's logo. As we all know, Sharapova has chosen to skip doing all three of these examples. 

Like you, I've looked at the rules and can't seem to figure out where the $700,000 dollars is coming from. The Tour doesn't specifically mention photo shoots often, although I think I might have found the "fine print" on page 107. 

The gist of it is that players are required to participate in one major Tour marketing event every year, which will not exceed five hours. Now, if this is what the Rome photoshoot is about, and from what I've read, it could very well be, this is why Sharapova's getting hit with a big fine. The Tour supposedly wants the Rome time to prepare a major marketing campaign for the Doha Championships. 

Although it does not state what the fine is for skipping this event, given its importance, I imagine it is fairly large.

Like I said earlier, she may not be getting one fine; instead she could be facing several compounded for a grand total of $700,000. 

Even if you are making as much as Sharapova is, losing $700,000 has still got to hurt. She may be the world's richest female athlete now, but I'm sure she remembers the days when Yuri brought her here with only a few hundred dollars in his pocket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pov, </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if I&#8217;ll be able to shine much light on the rules situation, but I&#8217;ll give it my best shot. </p>
<p>The Sharapova situation is tricky as it involves several rule contingencies. For all her off-court activities, Sharapova is not known as one of the Tour&#8217;s most giving when it comes to her time during tournaments. </p>
<p>The most recent ACES standings that I can find were from April 21, which show Sharapova down at No. 10.</p>
<p>Another reason why Sharapova could incur an additional fine is because she does not wear a Tour patch. Players can support the Tour (and avoid fines) in a lot of ways including participating in tournament off-court events, doing photo shoots, or wearing the Tour&#8217;s logo. As we all know, Sharapova has chosen to skip doing all three of these examples. </p>
<p>Like you, I&#8217;ve looked at the rules and can&#8217;t seem to figure out where the $700,000 dollars is coming from. The Tour doesn&#8217;t specifically mention photo shoots often, although I think I might have found the &#8220;fine print&#8221; on page 107. </p>
<p>The gist of it is that players are required to participate in one major Tour marketing event every year, which will not exceed five hours. Now, if this is what the Rome photoshoot is about, and from what I&#8217;ve read, it could very well be, this is why Sharapova&#8217;s getting hit with a big fine. The Tour supposedly wants the Rome time to prepare a major marketing campaign for the Doha Championships. </p>
<p>Although it does not state what the fine is for skipping this event, given its importance, I imagine it is fairly large.</p>
<p>Like I said earlier, she may not be getting one fine; instead she could be facing several compounded for a grand total of $700,000. </p>
<p>Even if you are making as much as Sharapova is, losing $700,000 has still got to hurt. She may be the world&#8217;s richest female athlete now, but I&#8217;m sure she remembers the days when Yuri brought her here with only a few hundred dollars in his pocket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.212 seconds -->
