<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Decade&#8217;s Top Ten Players, Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/28/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/28/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-1/</link>
	<description>Women&#039;s Professional Tennis News, Results, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:59:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Decade&#8217;s Top Ten Tennis Players, Part 2 - On the Baseline Tennis News</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/28/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-55970</link>
		<dc:creator>The Decade&#8217;s Top Ten Tennis Players, Part 2 - On the Baseline Tennis News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/?p=8923#comment-55970</guid>
		<description>[...] Matt Trollope continues his Players of the Decade countdown at On the Baseline by unveiling his picks for the Top 5 players of the past ten years. To see his picks for players 6-10, go here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matt Trollope continues his Players of the Decade countdown at On the Baseline by unveiling his picks for the Top 5 players of the past ten years. To see his picks for players 6-10, go here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaress Lawless</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/28/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-55850</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaress Lawless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/?p=8923#comment-55850</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrew, 

The rest of Matt&#039;s list will be published at OTB later this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew, </p>
<p>The rest of Matt&#8217;s list will be published at OTB later this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Broad</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/28/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-55835</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Broad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/?p=8923#comment-55835</guid>
		<description>Technically, I can&#039;t deny that Mauresmo is a two-time Major champion, but she won the Australian Open 2006 with the help of retirements in her third round, semi-final and final.

There&#039;s no way she belongs ahead of three-time Major champion Jennifer Capriati.

I&#039;d also put Mauresmo behind Kuznetsova, who truly did win two Majors in the Noughties, even though she was never #1 (which, let&#039;s face it, is a pretty meaningless accomplishment when it can be achieved by two players who have never won a Major).

I would rank the players primarily by number of Majors won, with weeks at #1 and WTA titles used only as tie-breakers (I don&#039;t consider Mauresmo and Kuznetsova to be tied, due to Mauresmo&#039;s AO 2006 title being greatly devalued by the retirements).

I take it Part 2 will be published here soon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically, I can&#8217;t deny that Mauresmo is a two-time Major champion, but she won the Australian Open 2006 with the help of retirements in her third round, semi-final and final.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no way she belongs ahead of three-time Major champion Jennifer Capriati.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also put Mauresmo behind Kuznetsova, who truly did win two Majors in the Noughties, even though she was never #1 (which, let&#8217;s face it, is a pretty meaningless accomplishment when it can be achieved by two players who have never won a Major).</p>
<p>I would rank the players primarily by number of Majors won, with weeks at #1 and WTA titles used only as tie-breakers (I don&#8217;t consider Mauresmo and Kuznetsova to be tied, due to Mauresmo&#8217;s AO 2006 title being greatly devalued by the retirements).</p>
<p>I take it Part 2 will be published here soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaress Lawless</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/28/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-55830</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaress Lawless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/?p=8923#comment-55830</guid>
		<description>Interesting list, Matt, and a great article as usual!

The inclusion of Mauresmo did make me ponder as well, but when you look at her record, it&#039;s hard to deny that she doesn&#039;t belong, especially if you factor in Kuznetsova, who never made it to No. 1 unlike Amelie. 

I think Amelie&#039;s inconsistency hurt her legacy, but there is no denying the fact that she&#039;s a two-time major champion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting list, Matt, and a great article as usual!</p>
<p>The inclusion of Mauresmo did make me ponder as well, but when you look at her record, it&#8217;s hard to deny that she doesn&#8217;t belong, especially if you factor in Kuznetsova, who never made it to No. 1 unlike Amelie. </p>
<p>I think Amelie&#8217;s inconsistency hurt her legacy, but there is no denying the fact that she&#8217;s a two-time major champion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter: MiamiTennisNews</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/28/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-55829</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter: MiamiTennisNews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/?p=8923#comment-55829</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t agree with sorting by decades-it masks results. Hingis has best results from the list @OnTheBaseline Agree with Matt&#039;s picks for 6-10?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t agree with sorting by decades-it masks results. Hingis has best results from the list @OnTheBaseline Agree with Matt&#8217;s picks for 6-10?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter: Ilovebabygigi</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/28/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-55828</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter: Ilovebabygigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/?p=8923#comment-55828</guid>
		<description>yes, but for some reason with all respect to Amelie but I don&#039;t think she belongs here in this list and surely not at #6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, but for some reason with all respect to Amelie but I don&#8217;t think she belongs here in this list and surely not at #6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

