<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Decade&#8217;s Top Ten Players, Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/31/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/31/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-2/</link>
	<description>Women&#039;s Professional Tennis News, Results, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:59:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phaura Reinz</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/31/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-56188</link>
		<dc:creator>Phaura Reinz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/?p=8949#comment-56188</guid>
		<description>thanks for this article... loved it,..

serena, justine and vee are the big three this decade... and their supremacy at slams just supplements their presence at the top...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for this article&#8230; loved it,..</p>
<p>serena, justine and vee are the big three this decade&#8230; and their supremacy at slams just supplements their presence at the top&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvin</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/31/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-56183</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/?p=8949#comment-56183</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s how I would rank the top 5 as well. Kim&#039;s consistency and longevity at the top, quick comebacks from injuries, and more importantly, winning the 2009 US Open three tournaments into a comeback after getting married and giving birth to a daughter puts Kim just slightly ahead of Sharapova&#039;s (impressive, yes) 3 grand slams, in my opinion.

#1, 2, and 3 are spot on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s how I would rank the top 5 as well. Kim&#8217;s consistency and longevity at the top, quick comebacks from injuries, and more importantly, winning the 2009 US Open three tournaments into a comeback after getting married and giving birth to a daughter puts Kim just slightly ahead of Sharapova&#8217;s (impressive, yes) 3 grand slams, in my opinion.</p>
<p>#1, 2, and 3 are spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Decade&#8217;s Top Ten Players, Part 1 - On the Baseline Tennis News</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/31/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-56180</link>
		<dc:creator>The Decade&#8217;s Top Ten Players, Part 1 - On the Baseline Tennis News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/?p=8949#comment-56180</guid>
		<description>[...] Matt Trollope is a journalist from Melbourne, Australia. He has covered the past two Australian Opens for the tournament&#8217;s official website. The second part of Matt&#8217;s article is available here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matt Trollope is a journalist from Melbourne, Australia. He has covered the past two Australian Opens for the tournament&#8217;s official website. The second part of Matt&#8217;s article is available here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Broad</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/31/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-56170</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Broad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/?p=8949#comment-56170</guid>
		<description>When Maria won each of her three Majors, she had more than just a hot fortnight.

She won Wimbledon 2004 at the end of a grass-court season in which she went 12:0 in singles after winning the singles- and doubles-titles at Birmingham.

The US Open 2006 was the start of a 19-match winning-streak for Maria, and the Australian Open 2008 was part of an 18:0 start to that year.

Between the Australian Open 2005 and the French Open 2007, Maria reached at least the semi-finals of every Major except the French Open 2005 and 2006. Then her shoulder-injury worsened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Maria won each of her three Majors, she had more than just a hot fortnight.</p>
<p>She won Wimbledon 2004 at the end of a grass-court season in which she went 12:0 in singles after winning the singles- and doubles-titles at Birmingham.</p>
<p>The US Open 2006 was the start of a 19-match winning-streak for Maria, and the Australian Open 2008 was part of an 18:0 start to that year.</p>
<p>Between the Australian Open 2005 and the French Open 2007, Maria reached at least the semi-finals of every Major except the French Open 2005 and 2006. Then her shoulder-injury worsened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/31/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-56095</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/?p=8949#comment-56095</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;[Comment Edited: Lisa, please take a look at our &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onthebaseline.com/comment-policy/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;comment guidelines&lt;/a&gt;. Personal attacks against other commenters are not permitted at OTB. Everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion regarding the rankings of the top players of the decade.]&lt;/em&gt;

Matt, the article was great...one of the best in a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>[Comment Edited: Lisa, please take a look at our <a href="http://www.onthebaseline.com/comment-policy/" rel="nofollow">comment guidelines</a>. Personal attacks against other commenters are not permitted at OTB. Everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion regarding the rankings of the top players of the decade.]</em></p>
<p>Matt, the article was great&#8230;one of the best in a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marine</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/31/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-56085</link>
		<dc:creator>Marine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 22:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/?p=8949#comment-56085</guid>
		<description>Matt, I think my argument is quite explanatory. Yes, grand slams do count a lot but I was looking at the consistency and no. of titles overall as well and that is why in my view Henin has clearly the edge over Williams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, I think my argument is quite explanatory. Yes, grand slams do count a lot but I was looking at the consistency and no. of titles overall as well and that is why in my view Henin has clearly the edge over Williams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Trollope</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/31/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-56056</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Trollope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/?p=8949#comment-56056</guid>
		<description>Andrew Broad and MiamiTennisNews,

I definitely agonised over the decision to rank Clijsters ahead of Sharapova. I think I actually had Maria ahead of Kim initially, before ultimately switching them. My reasoning was that Clijsters has been a more consistent presence at the top of the game than Sharapova, and for a longer period. She has been a force in tennis since 2001, and since returning from her brief retirement, she has shot straight back up the rankings. She&#039;s won almost double the number of titles, and she has demonstrated greater proficiency across all surfaces. Their games match up fairly similarly, except that Clijsters is well ahead when it comes to court coverage and athleticism. 

This does not discount from Maria&#039;s achievements - winning three different Grand Slams is a magnigficent feat, and is better than what Kim has done. However, it seems to me that these triumphs have been the product of Sharapova having a &quot;hot fortnight&quot;, and she has struggled to maintain her peak form for long periods. She has also been susceptible to bombing out early in Grand Slams (perhaps her shoulder troubles have contributed?) whereas Clijsters has rarely failed to reach the second week in a major. Her longevity is not as impressive as Clijsters&#039; either, but she has many more years ahead of her to eventually outshine the Belgian. 

As for Marine&#039;s comment, I really can&#039;t see how the stats support Henin being ranked ahead of Serena. Serena&#039;s four straight Grand Slam wins and a further six across the decade trumps anything Henin has accomplished. As impressive as Henin&#039;s game and career is, her achievements don&#039;t quite match up to Serena&#039;s.

Hope everybody has been enjoying the list!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Broad and MiamiTennisNews,</p>
<p>I definitely agonised over the decision to rank Clijsters ahead of Sharapova. I think I actually had Maria ahead of Kim initially, before ultimately switching them. My reasoning was that Clijsters has been a more consistent presence at the top of the game than Sharapova, and for a longer period. She has been a force in tennis since 2001, and since returning from her brief retirement, she has shot straight back up the rankings. She&#8217;s won almost double the number of titles, and she has demonstrated greater proficiency across all surfaces. Their games match up fairly similarly, except that Clijsters is well ahead when it comes to court coverage and athleticism. </p>
<p>This does not discount from Maria&#8217;s achievements &#8211; winning three different Grand Slams is a magnigficent feat, and is better than what Kim has done. However, it seems to me that these triumphs have been the product of Sharapova having a &#8220;hot fortnight&#8221;, and she has struggled to maintain her peak form for long periods. She has also been susceptible to bombing out early in Grand Slams (perhaps her shoulder troubles have contributed?) whereas Clijsters has rarely failed to reach the second week in a major. Her longevity is not as impressive as Clijsters&#8217; either, but she has many more years ahead of her to eventually outshine the Belgian. </p>
<p>As for Marine&#8217;s comment, I really can&#8217;t see how the stats support Henin being ranked ahead of Serena. Serena&#8217;s four straight Grand Slam wins and a further six across the decade trumps anything Henin has accomplished. As impressive as Henin&#8217;s game and career is, her achievements don&#8217;t quite match up to Serena&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Hope everybody has been enjoying the list!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaress Lawless</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/31/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-56032</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaress Lawless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/?p=8949#comment-56032</guid>
		<description>Kumbabeck, 

This article takes into account only the results of the past decade which is why the total number of Venus and Serena Williams&#039;s titles were not counted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kumbabeck, </p>
<p>This article takes into account only the results of the past decade which is why the total number of Venus and Serena Williams&#8217;s titles were not counted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kumbabeck</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/31/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-56023</link>
		<dc:creator>kumbabeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/?p=8949#comment-56023</guid>
		<description>I thought Venus has won 41 titles and u print that she has 32 what&#039;s up with that.Also Serena has 35 titles and not 30 as stated.PLs do more research as Henin were correctly stated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Venus has won 41 titles and u print that she has 32 what&#8217;s up with that.Also Serena has 35 titles and not 30 as stated.PLs do more research as Henin were correctly stated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marine</title>
		<link>http://www.onthebaseline.com/2009/12/31/the-decades-top-ten-tennis-players-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-56016</link>
		<dc:creator>Marine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onthebaseline.com/?p=8949#comment-56016</guid>
		<description>Also regarding Serena&#039;s mental fortitude... have you watched US Open?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also regarding Serena&#8217;s mental fortitude&#8230; have you watched US Open?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

